scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal + Sunterlib questions

To: scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] Packaging proposal + Sunterlib questions
From: Anthony Carrico <acarrico@memebeam.org>
Date: Sat Nov 22 14:33:01 2003
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
> Since there is currently no packaging standard for Scheme48, I think
> that it would make sense to install them at the same location as the
> scsh libraries, yes.

Are there any s48 users who don't use scsh? I wonder. I'm not really
familiar with what features are more advanced in s48 vs scsh anymore.

> Anyway, this looks like a nice problem to test the flexibility of the
> current proposal, in particular the install script. I'd like to try to
> make an install script which first installs all the individual
> libraries, and then defines and install the "meta-library". Or, if you
> already started working on this, you could do it and tell me how well
> the current install library copes with that. Or we can collaborate,
> whatever.

If you work on it, send me your code. Next week has a holiday in the
States. I'll probably tinker with it then, but I'll somewhat offline.

-- 
Anthony Carrico


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>