scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] Proposal for packaging of scsh libraries

To: scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] Proposal for packaging of scsh libraries
From: Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch>
Date: Wed Nov 19 05:40:11 2003
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Andreas Bernauer <andreas.bernauer@gmx.de> writes:

> Michel Schinz wrote:
>> I have another suggestion which goes a bit in your direction: we could
>> say that "-ll" can also be given the name of a *directory* as
>> argument. In that case, it would look for a file, say "packages.scm"
>> in that directory. A bit like HTTP servers look for "index.html" when
>> the client requests a directory. 
>
> Just in case we are voting about this issue, too: I vote for this!
> This will be very useful in my opinion, as symlinked packages.scm
> don't work.

Indeed, that's also something I found out while performing some
experiments related to know how to organise packages.

I think, by the way, that scsh/scheme48 should be "fixed" so that it
chases symbolic links when loading files, and interprets relative file
names relatively to the location of the target of the symbolic link,
and not at the location of the link itself, as it does now.

Michel.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>