Re: [Scsh-hackers] Proposal for packaging of scsh libraries

[Andreas Bernauer <andreas.bernauer@gmx.de>]

Michel Schinz wrote:
> I have another suggestion which goes a bit in your direction: we could
> say that "-ll" can also be given the name of a *directory* as
> argument. In that case, it would look for a file, say "packages.scm"
> in that directory. A bit like HTTP servers look for "index.html" when
> the client requests a directory. 

Just in case we are voting about this issue, too: I vote for this!
This will be very useful in my opinion, as symlinked packages.scm
don't work.

Andreas.

pgprGKSJdWxWX.pgp
Description: PGP signature