scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] "precompiled" libraries

To: scsh hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] "precompiled" libraries
From: Andreas Bernauer <andreas.bernauer@gmx.de>
Date: Mon Nov 17 08:07:13 2003
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Mail-followup-to: scsh hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Martin Gasbichler wrote:
> >> I have written some code to provide separate compilation of
> >> byte-code. Currently the speedup is not very high (about a factor of
> >> 3) but I plan to add what I have to Sunterlib within the next few
> >> weeks. 
> >
> > Although this is good news, I [am not sure if] you are addressing 
> > [what] I meant initially.  
> > What I meant initially is that I wanted to have scsh libraries
> > compiled from source code to byte-code so that they can be loaded fast
> > into scripts.
> 
> That's what I call "separate compilation".

Oh, sorry, I misunderstood you.

So I can compile my libraries seperately and load the bytecode into my
scsh script?  Cool!  Sounds like that's exactly what I was looking
for. 

Andreas. 

Attachment: pgpJmOzKoGVhZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>