scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] "precompiled" libraries

To: scsh hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] "precompiled" libraries
From: Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Mon Nov 17 06:58:40 2003
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Andreas Bernauer <andreas.bernauer@gmx.de> writes:

> Martin Gasbichler wrote:
>> >> as we discuss the packaging of libraries, I remembered a feature about
>> >> libraries that I would like to have besides of having it installed in
>> >> a structured way.  I am not sure, if this issue has been discussed
>> >> earlier: I'd like to have the possibility of "precompiled" libraries.
>> 
>> I have written some code to provide separate compilation of
>> byte-code. Currently the speedup is not very high (about a factor of
>> 3) but I plan to add what I have to Sunterlib within the next few
>> weeks. 
>
> Although this is good news, I you are addressing want I meant
> initially.  What you've wrote sounds like I'll be able to compile
> byte-code to machine-dependent code, so I can "execute" my scsh files
> "directly". 

This would be compiling to native-code, wouldn't it?

> What I meant initially is that I wanted to have scsh libraries
> compiled from source code to byte-code so that they can be loaded fast
> into scripts.

That's what I call "separate compilation".


--
Martin


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>