Martin Gasbichler wrote:
> >> as we discuss the packaging of libraries, I remembered a feature about
> >> libraries that I would like to have besides of having it installed in
> >> a structured way. I am not sure, if this issue has been discussed
> >> earlier: I'd like to have the possibility of "precompiled" libraries.
>
> I have written some code to provide separate compilation of
> byte-code. Currently the speedup is not very high (about a factor of
> 3) but I plan to add what I have to Sunterlib within the next few
> weeks.
Although this is good news, I you are addressing want I meant
initially. What you've wrote sounds like I'll be able to compile
byte-code to machine-dependent code, so I can "execute" my scsh files
"directly".
What I meant initially is that I wanted to have scsh libraries
compiled from source code to byte-code so that they can be loaded fast
into scripts.
> I do not want to let the progress of the packaging proposal depend on
> the availability of this code and propose therefore to ignore this
> issue in the first version.
Definitely, especially as it seems to be more a s48 issue than a scsh
issue.
Andreas.
pgp564HFX24MG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|