scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] "precompiled" libraries

To: bernauer@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] "precompiled" libraries
From: Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch>
Date: Sun Nov 16 06:58:12 2003
Cc: scsh hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Le 14 nov. 03, à 22:31, bernauer@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de a écrit :

Hi,

as we discuss the packaging of libraries, I remembered a feature about
libraries that I would like to have besides of having it installed in
a structured way.  I am not sure, if this issue has been discussed
earlier: I'd like to have the possibility of "precompiled" libraries.

That would definitely be interesting. As a matter of fact, you would be interested to know that Olin agrees with you, because he one wrote the following in c.l.scheme a few years back:

  [...]
By the way, I have for some years now been convinced that the single biggest technical barrier to using scsh as a perl alternate is the fact that S48 has
  been around for about 10 y and still provides no way to separately
  byte-compile modules into loadable object files.
  [...]

You can read the whole thread on Google, there:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF -8&safe=off&frame=right&th=9ec3db6ad35954c1&seekm=j7vem61m2j4.fsf%40sun. cs.rice.edu#link1

Michel.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>