Re: [Scsh-hackers] scsh-yp builds dynamic libraries

[Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch>]

Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:

[...]

> I would still prefer having an exec script but wanted to mention this
> option as well.

Ok.

[...]

> The scheme code could go to a sub-directory "scheme".

I'll add that to my proposal.

[...]

>> Are there other things to think about?
>
> We probably should fix the name of the initialization function to
> s48_PACKAGENAME_init or so.

Ok. By the way, do all packages with shared libraries need such an
initialisation function? If yes, what is its purpose? (Hmm, re-reading
the s48 doc, I see "We recommend that a dynamically-loaded file
contain a single initialization procedure that creates shared bindings
for the values exported by the file." I guess that answers my
question).

Michel.