scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] scsh 0.6.4 and staging directories

To: Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch>
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] scsh 0.6.4 and staging directories
From: Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Tue Oct 7 06:08:05 2003
Cc: scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch> writes:

> Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
>
>> Michel Schinz <Michel.Schinz@epfl.ch> writes:
>
> I think so, yes, because it includes Andreas Voegele's patch, which
> apparently does what I want. I cannot test it right now since
> SourceForge's CVS server is down, but just by looking at it I would
> say yes.

Okay. I guess we also need to fix the installation of the manpage. I
would appreciate if you could verify that the head of the r0-6-stable
branch is indeed suitable for packaging.

> Ok, I would say that there is some demand, since at least the Debian
> and Fink users who have problems using pp.scm would be happy to have a
> fix. OTOH, I don't want to annoy you with that, as I said I can at
> least work around the problem with a patch for now.

I agree that fixing this in the release is a better way than patching
from the package description. I'll try to fix the outstanding problems
as soon as possible.

--
Martin


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>