| To: | Eric Marsden <emarsden@laas.fr> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.4 Beta 1 |
| From: | "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@zurich.ai.mit.edu> |
| Date: | Thu Mar 13 17:40:02 2003 |
| Cc: | Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>, scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net> |
| List-id: | Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| Reply-to: | "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@ai.mit.edu> |
| Sender: | scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net |
Eric Marsden writes: > >>>>> "mg" == Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> > >>>>> writes: > > mg> + make check tests only the S48 part (with it's borken socket > mg> implementation). The tests relevant to scsh itself can be invoked by > mg> > mg> scsh -lm scsh/test/test-packages.scm -o test-all -c "(test-all)" > > ok, these tests work on MacOS X. This was scsh 0.6.4 (Beta 4). I updated to the latest (as of this afternoon) cygwin. Things basically work. I hadn't run test-all before. I found that there are failures because Win32 with cygwin doesn't have fifos. Is there a methodology for skipping tests based on platform? Should I not add the test with add-test! or should I check within the test itself? I think the former would make more sense. -bri |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.4 Beta 1, Eric Marsden |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.4 Beta 1, Martin Gasbichler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.4 Beta 1, Eric Marsden |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.4 Beta 1, Martin Gasbichler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |