scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.4 Beta 1

To: Eric Marsden <emarsden@laas.fr>
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.4 Beta 1
From: "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@zurich.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Thu Mar 13 17:40:02 2003
Cc: Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>, scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Reply-to: "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@ai.mit.edu>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Eric Marsden writes:
 > >>>>> "mg" == Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> 
 > >>>>> writes:
 > 
 >   mg> + make check tests only the S48 part (with it's borken socket
 >   mg> implementation). The tests relevant to scsh itself can be invoked by
 >   mg> 
 >   mg> scsh -lm scsh/test/test-packages.scm -o test-all -c "(test-all)"
 > 
 > ok, these tests work on MacOS X. This was scsh 0.6.4 (Beta 4).

I updated to the latest (as of this afternoon) cygwin. Things basically
work. I hadn't run test-all before. I found that there are failures
because Win32 with cygwin doesn't have fifos. Is there a methodology for
skipping tests based on platform? Should I not add the test with
add-test! or should I check within the test itself? I think the former
would make more sense.

-bri


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>