| To: | sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Saving calls to file-info |
| From: | Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> |
| Date: | Mon Jul 1 23:56:36 2002 |
| Cc: | scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net> |
| List-id: | Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| Sender: | scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net |
>>>>> "Mike" == Michael Sperber <sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes: Martin> I think we can easily remedy this by allowing the mentioned procedures Martin> to accept a file-info record as argument. Mike> What's the good reason for overloading? Why can't we just define Mike> additional accessors for FILE-INFO? It's heavily overloaded anyway, so why bother about one more? -- Martin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Saving calls to file-info, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Saving calls to file-info, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Saving calls to file-info, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Saving calls to file-info, Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |