| To: | scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Scsh-hackers] set-effective-uid |
| From: | Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> |
| Date: | Wed May 15 01:30:04 2002 |
| List-id: | Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| Sender: | scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net |
Is there a special reason that the scsh API does not provide a binding to seteuid/setegid? Okay, they are not POSIX, but I accidentally included them in the source of 0.6 and at least the emulation via setreuid seems to be available always. -- Martin |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] 0.6.2 beta version, Martin Gasbichler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-560165 ] Problem with regexp-search? in 0.6.2, noreply |
| Previous by Thread: | [Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-553356 ] Home page and ftp site unreachable, noreply |
| Next by Thread: | [Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-560165 ] Problem with regexp-search? in 0.6.2, noreply |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |