| To: | Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Testing the tarball |
| From: | "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@zurich.ai.mit.edu> |
| Date: | Tue Jan 8 11:00:10 2002 |
| Cc: | scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net> |
| List-id: | Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| Reply-to: | "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@ai.mit.edu> |
| Sender: | scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net |
Martin Gasbichler writes: > Brian> 1.) All of the cygwin support never made it into 0.6 apparently. > That's not true. Only configure.in was broken. See my commit. Sorry I jumped to conclusions. I don't have 0.6 on this machine. is there a new tarball to test? -bri |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Scsh-hackers] Testing the tarball, Brian D. Carlstrom |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Testing the tarball, Martin Gasbichler |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Testing the tarball, Martin Gasbichler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Scsh-hackers] Testing the tarball, Martin Gasbichler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |