scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] Testing the tarball

To: Eric Marsden <emarsden@laas.fr>
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] Testing the tarball
From: Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Tue Jan 8 10:32:09 2002
Cc: scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> "ecm" == Eric Marsden <emarsden@laas.fr> writes:

>>>>> "mg" == Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
mg> *PLEASE* try to install it and tell me whether it worked!

ecm> it builds on linuxppc, but installation fails during inst-doc: it
ecm> doesn't find any ./doc/src/*.dvi and ./doc/src/*.ps and stops.

ecm> It also builds and runs (haven't done any real testing, just do ./go
ecm> and some multiplications) on a few other platforms, but installation
ecm> fails for the same reason:

ecm>   - MacOS X 10.1
ecm>   - Solaris 8 on SPARC
ecm>   - FreeBSD/x86 4.4
ecm>   - Linux/UltraSPARC (kernel 2.2.18)
ecm>   - Linux/RS6000 (kernel 2.2.17)

Okay, this should be fixed.

ecm> It doesn't build on AlphaLinux, because for some ridiculous reason
ecm> SIGINFO == SIGPWR there, so scsh_aux.c doesn't compile (duplicate case
ecm> values). If it's legal to have different signal names with the same
ecm> value, the test would have to be changed to a sequence of ifs.

Oh my god... Maybe I will have to do something analogous to SIGIO/SIGPOLL.

ecm> It doesn't build on HPUX 10.2 because it doesn't have seteuid and
ecm> setegid; however, it does have setreuid and setregid (from
ecm> <sys/unistd.h>) -- maybe autoconf knows about that one?   

I will check this.

-- 
Martin


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>