scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

[Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-433867 ] Artificial fdport limit is too low

To: noreply@sourceforge.net
Subject: [Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-433867 ] Artificial fdport limit is too low
From: noreply@sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 01:31:39 -0700
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Bugs item #433867, was updated on 2001-06-17 02:37
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110493&aid=433867&group_id=10493

Category: run-time
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Mike Sperber (sperber)
Assigned to: Olin Shivers (olin-shivers)
Summary: Artificial fdport limit is too low

Initial Comment:
Both scsh 0.5 and 0.6 impose a limit of 255
on the maximum value of an fdport index.

This limit is definitely too low, and multithreaded
Internet servers are quite likely to hit it fairly
fast --- I've just seen SUnet ftpd bail out because
of it.

Actually, there should not even be a limit at all.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Martin Gasbichler (mainzelm)
Date: 2001-06-21 01:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=17553

I just fixed this in 0.6 by using an integer table.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110493&aid=433867&group_id=10493


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>