Bugs item #407895, was updated on 2001-03-12 05:03
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110493&aid=407895&group_id=10493
Category: Documentation
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Martin Gasbichler (mainzelm)
Assigned to: Olin Shivers (olin-shivers)
Summary: type/name not documented
Initial Comment:
The manual does not mention that (define-record name
...) from defrec-package defines a variable type/name
bound to the type of the record.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Martin Gasbichler (mainzelm)
Date: 2001-05-13 13:11
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=17553
You need the name of the type for define-record-discloser
and define-record-resumer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Olin Shivers (olin-shivers)
Date: 2001-05-11 16:00
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=101304
There's no exported operation you can perform on the
type/name
value, so what's the point of telling people it's there?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2001-03-12 07:20
Message:
Logged In: NO
In fact, the define-record form has lots of new,
exciting features, that need to be documented.
The source code is quite well commented, so
all features are described there.
May I add, parenthetically, that this damned
sourceforge bugtracking system wraps lines
longer than about eight chars. Urgh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110493&aid=407895&group_id=10493
|