scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

[Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-407895 ] type/name not documented

To: noreply@sourceforge.net
Subject: [Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-407895 ] type/name not documented
From: noreply@sourceforge.net
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 16:00:40 -0700
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Bugs item #407895, was updated on 2001-03-12 05:03
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110493&aid=407895&group_id=10493

Category: Documentation
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Martin Gasbichler (mainzelm)
Assigned to: Olin Shivers (olin-shivers)
Summary: type/name not documented

Initial Comment:
The manual does not mention that (define-record name
...) from defrec-package defines a variable type/name
bound to the type of the record. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Olin Shivers (olin-shivers)
Date: 2001-05-11 16:00

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=101304

There's no exported operation you can perform on the
type/name
value, so what's the point of telling people it's there?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2001-03-12 07:20

Message:
Logged In: NO 

In fact, the define-record form has lots of new,
exciting features, that need to be documented.
The source code is quite well commented, so
all features are described there.

May I add, parenthetically, that this damned
sourceforge bugtracking system wraps lines
longer than about eight chars. Urgh.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110493&aid=407895&group_id=10493


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>