| To: | noreply@sourceforge.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-408220 ] no-directory vs. not-directory |
| From: | nobody <nobody@sourceforge.net> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2001 07:48:22 -0800 |
| List-id: | Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| Sender: | scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net |
Bugs #408220, was updated on 2001-03-13 07:48 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110493&aid=408220&group_id=10493 Category: Documentation Group: None Status: Open Priority: 2 Submitted By: Martin Gasbichler Assigned to: Olin Shivers Summary: no-directory vs. not-directory Initial Comment: The manual (sec. 3.3) lists 'no-directory as a possible return value of file-not-readable?, but the source code in fileinfo.scm returns 'noT-directory for this case. I dunno which is the intended symbol... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110493&aid=408220&group_id=10493 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Scsh-hackers] Re: select & buffering, Martin Gasbichler |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-407793 ] external symbol lookups, nobody |
| Previous by Thread: | [Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-408136 ] can't catch SIGALRM, nobody |
| Next by Thread: | [Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-408220 ] no-directory vs. not-directory, noreply |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |