scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

[Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-408220 ] no-directory vs. not-directory

To: noreply@sourceforge.net
Subject: [Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-408220 ] no-directory vs. not-directory
From: nobody <nobody@sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 07:48:22 -0800
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Bugs #408220, was updated on 2001-03-13 07:48
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110493&aid=408220&group_id=10493

Category: Documentation
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 2
Submitted By: Martin Gasbichler
Assigned to: Olin Shivers
Summary: no-directory vs. not-directory

Initial Comment:
The manual (sec. 3.3) lists 'no-directory as a possible
return value of file-not-readable?, but the source code
in fileinfo.scm returns 'noT-directory for this case. 

I dunno which is the intended symbol...



----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110493&aid=408220&group_id=10493


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>