| To: | scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Scsh-hackers] my status |
| From: | "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@zurich.ai.mit.edu> |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:35:13 -0500 |
| List-id: | Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| Reply-to: | "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@ai.mit.edu> |
| Sender: | scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net |
Recovering from the ton of mail from Olin et al. Is there some reason we aren't using this list? Then I could be using it to sort this mail into a SCSH folder to keep it straight. I'm going through my list mailbox filing emails I had containing bugs. I'd like to do that before doing 0.5.3 out, to be safe. Specifically what is holding me up is that a bug I filled did not show up on the list so I want to wait til I can trust it before going and filing on my bugs. Why would we be checking into both 0.5 and 0.6? can't the changes be integrated from one branch to another? or did we really not create them as branches? so I'm trying to sour out source forge at the moment. -bri |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Scsh-hackers] Re: IP addresses, Alan Bawden |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Scsh-hackers] [ scsh-Bugs-407793 ] external symbol lookups, nobody |
| Previous by Thread: | [Scsh-hackers] Re: IP addresses, Alan Bawden |
| Next by Thread: | [Scsh-hackers] Re: bdc status, Martin Gasbichler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |