scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

[Scsh-hackers] my status

To: scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Scsh-hackers] my status
From: "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@zurich.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 20:35:13 -0500
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Reply-to: "Brian D. Carlstrom" <bdc@ai.mit.edu>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Recovering from the ton of mail from Olin et al. Is there some reason we
aren't using this list? Then I could be using it to sort this mail into
a SCSH folder to keep it straight.

I'm going through my list mailbox filing emails I had containing bugs.
I'd like to do that before doing 0.5.3 out, to be safe.

Specifically what is holding me up is that a bug I filled did not show
up on the list so I want to wait til I can trust it before going and
filing on my bugs. 

Why would we be checking into both 0.5 and 0.6? can't the changes be
integrated from one branch to another? or did we really not create them
as branches?

so I'm trying to sour out source forge at the moment.

-bri


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>