scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

[Scsh-hackers] Re: Progress

To: scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Scsh-hackers] Re: Progress
From: Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: 11 Mar 2001 13:38:34 +0100
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> "Olin" == Olin Shivers <shivers@mongkok.cc.gt.atl.ga.us> writes:

Olin> I have just checked in all the mods to the 0.5 source tree to
Olin> move scsh over to SRFIs 13 & 14. What a pain -- lots of char
Olin> & string processing all through the system had to be changed;
Olin> wrote deprecated-proc compat libs for old API's, etc.

Olin> I have a pre/post diff that I can apply to the 0.6 tree. The manual
Olin> needs to be updated, as well.

Yeah, update 0.6 as well.


Olin> Further todos for me:
Olin> - Clean up the multiple versions of the awk source file I have laying
Olin>   around.
Olin> - Review Mike's I/O redirection proposal carefully.
Olin> - Check up on the time() error-reporting issue in Atlanta.
Olin> - The exec/path search path needs to be a fluid. Currently it cannot
Olin>   be set; big lose.
Olin> - Document the library-search-path feature
Olin> - Lots of other doc issues

Olin> - Recreate lost scsh-hackers email explaining why #|...|# needs
to go.
This is only there since I'm writing a SRFI about multi-line comments and
wanted to implement it by myself. Let's discuss about taking this into
scsh after the SRFI if final. I'll revert to the old reader in the CVS
tomorrow.



Olin> I would be willing to do a point release *without* these things just
Olin> to get the bugfixes out there & get the new code exercised, following
Olin> up with a 0.5.4 integrating the above. BDC, what do you think?

Hey stop! I thought we agreed that 0.5.3 should mainly contain bug
fixes and we focus on 0.6 after that. 

Put 0.5.3 out NOW. After that we fix the API for 0.6. I'll implement
it and you can proceed with the above list in the 0.6 tree. 

Maintaining both trees is unnecessary work.


-- 
Martin


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>