scsh-hackers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Scsh-hackers] Re: scsh development

To: Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
Subject: Re: [Scsh-hackers] Re: scsh development
From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])
Date: 22 Jan 2001 10:05:40 +0100
Cc: scsh-hackers <scsh-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-id: Discussion among the implementors <scsh-hackers.lists.sourceforge.net>
Sender: scsh-hackers-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> 
>>>>> writes:

>>>>> "Olin" == shivers  <shivers@cc.gatech.edu> writes:

Olin> Well, cool. What's the plan?

Olin> I believe the OS/shell/Posix interfaces are no longer the really
Olin> important thing. I think the number one important thing is
Olin> separate byte compilation & dynamic linking of byte-compiled
Olin> modules from files. That's what would really enable use of scsh
Olin> as a scripting tool.

Olin> But back to Kelsey -- this means that he's unlikely to implement
Olin> seperate compilation for S48. 10 years have gone by and it
Olin> hasn't happened, so if a scsh hacker doesn't do it, it isn't
Olin> going to happen.

Well, it's on the list, and Richard has already done some work towards
this for 0.54.  To give you some incentive: Richard has recently been
a lot more responsive than you have ...

-- 
Cheers =8-} M.
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>